Organisations faced significant hurdles with limited traceability, a restricted vendor network, and manual RFQ processes. Early feedback indicated that Penny’s platform was:
Manual processes and delayed approvals
Disjointed workflows across procurement and finance
Limited traceability and low vendor engagement
Poor user satisfaction & low adoption
Unable to support modern procurement efficiency.
The frustration was real. Penny wasn’t just difficult to use, it was affecting bottom-line business performance.
“We need faster decisions, not more frustration!”
This wasn’t just a UI problem. It was an operational breakdown. To fix it, I needed to align design with business strategy.
Led the entire UX transformation from research to implementation
Partnered with C-suite to align UX with business KPIs
Drove collaboration across product, engineering, and operations
Built a scalable UX framework and design system for long-term growth
Led the team of 3 designers and 1 developer
But fixing Penny meant understanding users first.
How did I achieve it ? Let’s understand
The strategic approach
What did we do?
Stakeholder analysis & influence mapping
In-depth user interviews & expert insights
End-to-end Source-to-Pay Journey mapping
UX audit & design evaluation
Competitive benchmarking
Let’s dive into it
Stakeholder analysis & influence mapping
Mapped key stakeholders across procurement, finance, product, and vendor teams.
Prioritized engagement based on influence and impact, using an influence matrix to identify decision-makers vs. end users facing friction.
User interviews & expert insights
Mapped key stakeholders across procurement, finance, product, and vendor teams.
Conducted in-depth interviews with procurement leads, suppliers, and finance stakeholders.
Engaged industry experts to benchmark against procurement best practices.
Used HotJar for contextual inquiry to observe live user behaviour and interaction patterns.
Fig: A few user persona
NDA limitations prevent me from publicly displaying the exact and detailed study on this specific part of the project. I'm happy to explain other personas with you in person. Please reach out to me for this part of the project.
Key insight:
The end-to-end Source-to-Pay process journey mapping
Mapped the full Source-to-Pay journey, breaking it into micro-journeys (Vendor Selection, RFQ Management, Approval, Negotiation, and Purchase).
Identified pain points at each stage, from vendor discovery to final invoice processing.
Measured time delays, inefficiencies, and redundant actions.
Fig: Source-to-Pay Journey
NDA limitations prevent me from publicly displaying the exact and detailed study on this specific part of the project. I'm happy to share other journeys with you in person. Please reach out to me for this part of the project.
UX audit & design evaluation
Fig: UX Audit & design evaluation
NDA limitations prevent me from publicly displaying the exact and detailed study on this specific part of the project. I'm happy to share more insights with you in person. Please reach out to me for this part of the project.
Competitive Analysis
Extracted key differentiators that could be leveraged for improvement.
Analyzed best-in-class procurement platforms for UX, automation, and efficiency
User stories, Information architecture and Flows
Fig: Competitive analysis
Solution outline
Wireframes & flows
Image: A few wireframes
Design system library
High fidelity interface
Rapid prototyping & user validation
Collaborative sprints with engineering for pixel-perfect delivery
Change management support for smooth rollout and adoption
Design library for consistency across features & teams
See what my colleagues have said
Leadership & strategic influence
Closing Thought